Rajshri Rajendra @ Rajesh Shimpi Other 5 vs Ashok Krishna Shimpi Other 5 Advocate - Marathe B. Z. — 1400017/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 0_0. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH060001702014
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1400017/2014
Filing Date
10-03-2014
Registration No
1400017/2014
Registration Date
10-03-2014
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajshri Rajendra @ Rajesh Shimpi Other 5
Adv. Sonawane B. V.
Ujawala Bap Rajendra @ Rajendra Shimpi
Sau. Reshma Bra. mahesh Jadhav
Ku. Namita Bap Rajendra @Rajesh shimpi
Sau. kadanbari Bra. vimal Shah
Ku. Manali Bap Rajenda @ Rajesh shimpi
Respondent(s)
Ashok Krishna Shimpi Other 5 Advocate - Marathe B. Z.
Narayan krushna shimpi
Pramod Ashok shimpi
Rahul @ Tinu Narayan shimpi
Sau. kokilabai Narayan Shimpi
Sau. Tarabai Bhra Ashok shimpi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 07-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application (Petition No. 5/2014) in a land dispute case. The court found that the petitioner (widow) had established her claim to the disputed property through documentary evidence, including revenue records, affidavits, and witness testimonies, demonstrating she is the rightful owner and possessor of the land in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application (Petition No. 5/2014) in a land dispute case. The court found that the petitioner (widow) had established her claim to the disputed property through documentary evidence, including revenue records, affidavits, and witness testimonies, demonstrating she is the rightful owner and possessor of the land in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts