State of Maharashtra vs Manoharlal Kashiram jaiswal Etc — 94/2001
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH060001092001
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
94/2001
Filing Date
21-08-2001
Registration No
94/2001
Registration Date
21-08-2001
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISCHARGED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Manoharlal Kashiram jaiswal Etc
Surjitsing Haranamsing Thakur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Proclomation
Proclomation
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 30-12-2025 | Proclomation | |
| 30-09-2025 | Proclomation |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged the two accused from charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (read with 34) because the accused had been absconding for over 25 years, key witnesses were untraceable or non-cooperative, and no evidence could be recorded despite attempts under CrPC section 299. The court found it unjust to keep the case pending indefinitely without progress and cancelled all bail bonds and standing warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged the two accused from charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (read with 34) because the accused had been absconding for over 25 years, key witnesses were untraceable or non-cooperative, and no evidence could be recorded despite attempts under CrPC section 299. The court found it unjust to keep the case pending indefinitely without progress and cancelled all bail bonds and standing warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts