State of Maharashtra vs Manoharlal Kashiram jaiswal Etc — 94/2001

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Disposed: Uncontested--DISCHARGED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH060001092001

Filing Number

94/2001

Filing Date

21-Aug-2001

Registration No

94/2001

Registration Date

21-Aug-2001

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISCHARGED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manoharlal Kashiram jaiswal Etc

  2. 2.Surjitsing Haranamsing Thakur

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court discharged the two accused from charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (read with 34) because the accused had been absconding for over 25 years, key witnesses were untraceable or non-cooperative, and no evidence could be recorded despite attempts under CrPC section 299. The court found it unjust to keep the case pending indefinitely without progress and cancelled all bail bonds and standing warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  6. 30-Dec-2025

    Proclomation

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  7. 30-Sep-2025

    Proclomation

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  8. 30-Jun-2025

    Proclomation

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  9. 28-Apr-2025

    Proclomation

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  10. 19-Mar-2025

    Proclomation

    Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda

  11. 28-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 21-Aug-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. 94/2001

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the two accused from charges under IPC sections 324, 323, 504, and 506 (read with 34) because the accused had been absconding for over 25 years, key witnesses were untraceable or non-cooperative, and no evidence could be recorded despite attempts under CrPC section 299. The court found it unjust to keep the case pending indefinitely without progress and cancelled all bail bonds and standing warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case