Pratapsing Vithoba Girase vs Jaysing Vithoba Girase Advocate - Bhamre V. P. — 1400035/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SuitforDistribution. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH060001002012
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1400035/2012
Filing Date
13-01-2012
Registration No
1400035/2012
Registration Date
13-01-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Shindkheda
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pratapsing Vithoba Girase
Adv. Marathe B. Z.
Respondent(s)
Jaysing Vithoba Girase Advocate - Bhamre V. P.
Kamalabai rupsing girase
ramsing vithoba girase
Sattarsing vithoba girase
Himmatsing Vithoba girase
kesarbai vithoba girase
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. J.M.F.C.Shindkheda
Arguments
Steps
Steps
Steps
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 30-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 12-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 23-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court allowed the defendant's application and admitted certified copies of documents (Exh. 146/1 to 146/7) as secondary evidence under Section 58(1) of the Bharatiya Saksha Adhiniyaman, 2023, since they were issued by public officers as revenue documents. However, the court noted that mere production of certified copies does not dispense with the requirement to prove the execution of these documents, which are exhibited for identification purposes only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court allowed the defendant's application and admitted certified copies of documents (Exh. 146/1 to 146/7) as secondary evidence under Section 58(1) of the Bharatiya Saksha Adhiniyaman, 2023, since they were issued by public officers as revenue documents. However, the court noted that mere production of certified copies does not dispense with the requirement to prove the execution of these documents, which are exhibited for identification purposes only. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts