The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap — 608/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050017332025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1216/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
608/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Disposed
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 09-03-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 28-01-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 27-11-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The court discharged accused Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis Report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case, and continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of court process. The court ordered refund of cash security, disposal of seized liquor, and cancellation of bail bond after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court discharged accused Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis Report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case, and continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of court process. The court ordered refund of cash security, disposal of seized liquor, and cancellation of bail bond after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts