The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap — 608/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050017332025
Filing Number
1216/2025
Filing Date
27-Nov-2025
Registration No
608/2025
Registration Date
27-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The court discharged accused Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis Report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case, and continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of court process. The court ordered refund of cash security, disposal of seized liquor, and cancellation of bail bond after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
10-Mar-2026
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
09-Mar-2026
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
28-Jan-2026
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
27-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 608/2025
Case Summary The court discharged accused Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis Report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case, and continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of court process. The court ordered refund of cash security, disposal of seized liquor, and cancellation of bail bond after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts