The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap — 608/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050017332025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1216/2025

Filing Date

27-11-2025

Registration No

608/2025

Registration Date

27-11-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Excise Department

Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Plea / Particulars

09-03-2026

Plea / Particulars

28-01-2026

Plea / Particulars

27-11-2025

Plea / Particulars

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The court discharged accused Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis Report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case, and continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of court process. The court ordered refund of cash security, disposal of seized liquor, and cancellation of bail bond after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court discharged accused Rajendra Uttamrao Jagtap from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis Report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case, and continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of court process. The court ordered refund of cash security, disposal of seized liquor, and cancellation of bail bond after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case