The State of Maharashtra (Pimpalner) vs Manoj Rama Mohite — 517/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050015052024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1080/2024

Filing Date

16-10-2024

Registration No

517/2024

Registration Date

16-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

120

Police Station

Pimpalner

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(A)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra (Pimpalner)

Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

Manoj Rama Mohite

Dattatray Purushottam Bagul

Raju Satilal Jopale

Sandip Chhagan Choure

Sanjay Ramdas Wagh

Munna Yunus Khatik

Pravin Ukhadu Pawar

Manasha Shantaram Mali

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

29-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

21-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court disposed of the case against eight accused persons under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to their continuous absence despite issuance of summons and warrants. All accused were discharged of gambling charges, their bail bonds canceled, and the seized cash of Rs. 34,950 ordered to be credited to the government, with prosecution retaining liberty to revive proceedings upon securing the accused's arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the case against eight accused persons under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to their continuous absence despite issuance of summons and warrants. All accused were discharged of gambling charges, their bail bonds canceled, and the seized cash of Rs. 34,950 ordered to be credited to the government, with prosecution retaining liberty to revive proceedings upon securing the accused's arrest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case