Yashwant Manohar Desale vs Rohidas Ramdas Pawar And 1 Advocate - Kedar Santosh S. — 529/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050014692019

Defence Evidence

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1140/2019

Filing Date

19-09-2019

Registration No

529/2019

Registration Date

19-09-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Yashwant Manohar Desale

Adv. Kulkarni Sarvottam S.

Respondent(s)

Rohidas Ramdas Pawar And 1 Advocate - Kedar Santosh S.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

30-03-2026

Defence Evidence

09-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

20-02-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

23-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

01-02-2020
Order on Exhibit

Summary: In Cri.M.A. No. 529/2019 (Yashwant vs. Rohidas + 1), a complaint filed under Section 134 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for a dishonored cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 was postponed. The court found prima facie substance in the complaint, as the bank memo indicated dishonor due to insufficient funds rather than signature defects. However, since the accused reside outside the court's jurisdiction (Kotamgaon, Nashik), the court postponed the issuance of process against them under Section 202(1) CrPC, 1973, and ordered the concerned police officer to conduct investigation and submit a report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Cri.M.A. No. 529/2019 (Yashwant vs. Rohidas + 1), a complaint filed under Section 134 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for a dishonored cheque of Rs. 1,00,000 was postponed. The court found prima facie substance in the complaint, as the bank memo indicated dishonor due to insufficient funds rather than signature defects. However, since the accused reside outside the court's jurisdiction (Kotamgaon, Nashik), the court postponed the issuance of process against them under Section 202(1) CrPC, 1973, and ordered the concerned police officer to conduct investigation and submit a report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case