The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner vs Dadaji Ramdas Gavit — 524/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050014672025
Filing Number
1053/2025
Filing Date
18-Sep-2025
Registration No
524/2025
Registration Date
18-Sep-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
161
Police Station
Pimpalner
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dadaji Ramdas Gavit
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Dadaji Ramdas Malich and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for alleged possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found no prima facie case against the accused because the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report was absent from the record, making it impossible to prove the substance was actually liquor or establish the offense ingredients. Continuing proceedings without material evidence would constitute abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
10-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
09-Mar-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
04-Feb-2026
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
12-Dec-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
18-Nov-2025
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
18-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 524/2025
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Dadaji Ramdas Malich and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for alleged possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found no prima facie case against the accused because the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report was absent from the record, making it impossible to prove the substance was actually liquor or establish the offense ingredients. Continuing proceedings without material evidence would constitute abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts