The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner vs Dadaji Ramdas Gavit — 524/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050014672025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1053/2025

Filing Date

18-09-2025

Registration No

524/2025

Registration Date

18-09-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

161

Police Station

Pimpalner

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner

Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

Dadaji Ramdas Gavit

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Filing of Surety

09-03-2026

Filing of Surety

04-02-2026

Filing of Surety

12-12-2025

Filing of Surety

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Dadaji Ramdas Malich and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for alleged possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found no prima facie case against the accused because the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report was absent from the record, making it impossible to prove the substance was actually liquor or establish the offense ingredients. Continuing proceedings without material evidence would constitute abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Dadaji Ramdas Malich and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code for alleged possession of unauthorized liquor under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act. The court found no prima facie case against the accused because the critical Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report was absent from the record, making it impossible to prove the substance was actually liquor or establish the offense ingredients. Continuing proceedings without material evidence would constitute abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case