The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Santosh Lahanu Gardare — 497/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050013672025

Filing Number

984/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

497/2025

Registration Date

25-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

13-Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Excise Department

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santosh Lahanu Gardare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Santosh Lahanu Gardare under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, discharging him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court cited the accused's prolonged absence despite multiple summons and NBW warrants, unavailable chemical analyzer reports, and lack of progress as justification for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  5. 29-Nov-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  6. 16-Oct-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  7. 11-Sep-2025

    N.B.W._Unready

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 497/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the case against Santosh Lahanu Gardare under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, discharging him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court cited the accused's prolonged absence despite multiple summons and NBW warrants, unavailable chemical analyzer reports, and lack of progress as justification for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case