The State of Maharashtra (Sakri) vs Vishnu Deoram Gaikawad Advocate - Salunke Mohandas B. — 112/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,452,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050012692019

Filing Number

978/2019

Filing Date

03-Sep-2019

Registration No

112/2019

Registration Date

03-Sep-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

13-Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

71

Police Station

Sakri

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354,452,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra (Sakri)

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vishnu Deoram Gaikawad Advocate - Salunke Mohandas B.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the defendant Vishnu Devra Gayakwad of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 354 (outraging modesty), 452 (house trespass), and 504 (intentional insult). The court found that while the complainant and her family members initially alleged the defendant had entered their home, harassed the complainant, and made threatening remarks, they later compromised the matter and retracted their testimony during court proceedings. The court ruled that insufficient credible evidence remained to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, thereby granting the defendant acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  9. 15-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  16. 19-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  17. 26-Jun-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  18. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  19. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  20. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  21. 13-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  22. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  23. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  24. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  25. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  26. 25-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  27. 22-May-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  28. 15-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  29. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  30. 25-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  31. 06-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  32. 11-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  33. 28-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  34. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  35. 16-May-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  36. 01-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  37. 27-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  38. 14-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  39. 19-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  40. 07-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  41. 05-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  42. 05-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  43. 27-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  44. 06-May-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  45. 19-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  46. 05-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  47. 10-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  48. 11-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  49. 11-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  50. 13-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  51. 10-May-2021

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  52. 17-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  53. 29-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  54. 19-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  55. 19-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  56. 10-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  57. 18-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  58. 30-Dec-2019

    Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri

  59. 03-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  60. 03-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the defendant Vishnu Devra Gayakwad of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 354 (outraging modesty), 452 (house trespass), and 504 (intentional insult). The court found that while the complainant and her family members initially alleged the defendant had entered their home, harassed the complainant, and made threatening remarks, they later compromised the matter and retracted their testimony during court proceedings. The court ruled that insufficient credible evidence remained to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, thereby granting the defendant acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case