The State of Maharashtra (Pimpalner) vs Anita Sunil Narvekar — 449/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050012612024
Filing Number
931/2024
Filing Date
04-Sep-2024
Registration No
449/2024
Registration Date
04-Sep-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
13-Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
Pimpalner
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra (Pimpalner)
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anita Sunil Narvekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Sakri disposed of the case against Anita Sunil Narvekar under Section 258 of the CrPC, discharging the accused of offences under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found it appropriate to stop proceedings due to the accused's prolonged absence despite multiple summons and NBW warrants, missing Chemical Analyzer reports, and unnecessary case pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
07-Jan-2026
B.W._Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
13-Nov-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
23-Sep-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
21-Jul-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
09-Jun-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
25-Feb-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
05-Feb-2025
B.W._Unready
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
14-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Jt Civil Judge Jd and JMFC Sakri
-
04-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 449/2024
The Judicial Magistrate Court in Sakri disposed of the case against Anita Sunil Narvekar under Section 258 of the CrPC, discharging the accused of offences under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found it appropriate to stop proceedings due to the accused's prolonged absence despite multiple summons and NBW warrants, missing Chemical Analyzer reports, and unnecessary case pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts