Jayshri Ravindra Mahale vs Ravindra Laxman Mahale etc — 110/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,20,22. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHDH050006262025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-04-2025

Filing Number

435/2025

Filing Date

04-04-2025

Registration No

110/2025

Registration Date

04-04-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

13-Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Sakri

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,20,22

Petitioner(s)

Jayshri Ravindra Mahale

Adv. Sale Alankar R.

Respondent(s)

Ravindra Laxman Mahale etc

Laxman Lodhu Mahale

Adv. Bagul P. V.

Subhadra Laxman Mahale

Sunil Laxman Mahale

Anita Bapu Bhadane

Bapu Hansraj Bhadane

Shantilal Londu Mahale

Mangal Shantilal Mahale

Himmat Chhagan Savale

Bhurabai Himmat Savale

Abhiman Rajaram Bhadane

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Sakri

09-03-2026

Disposed

20-01-2026

Dismissal Order

05-12-2025

Steps_Unready

18-11-2025

Steps_Unready

14-10-2025

W.S. and Say

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Sakri dismissed the criminal application filed by Jayashree Mahale against Ravindra Mahale & others in default due to the applicant's prolonged absence and failure to take effective steps despite prior court orders. The court found that the applicant's continued absence demonstrated lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Sakri dismissed the criminal application filed by Jayashree Mahale against Ravindra Mahale & others in default due to the applicant's prolonged absence and failure to take effective steps despite prior court orders. The court found that the applicant's continued absence demonstrated lack of interest in proceeding with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case