The State of Maharashtra vs Daga Dalpat Kakulate etc 2 Advocate - Salunke Mohandas B. — 56/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050005392018
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
430/2018
Filing Date
06-04-2018
Registration No
56/2018
Registration Date
06-04-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
Sakri
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Daga Dalpat Kakulate etc 2 Advocate - Salunke Mohandas B.
Mohan @ Hilal Daga Kakulate.
Pappu @ Hemraj Daga Kakulate.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 20-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 25-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 08-10-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This is a witness examination record (Marathi) from a criminal case (FIR No. 56/2018) dated 21.08.2024. The witness, Mohan Subhash Pakale, testified regarding his presence during police panchnama (official inspection report) at the crime scene on 13.05.2017 and identification of a wooden stick allegedly used as a weapon. The examination and cross-examination of the witness were completed, with the defense counsel declining further questioning, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a witness examination record (Marathi) from a criminal case (FIR No. 56/2018) dated 21.08.2024. The witness, Mohan Subhash Pakale, testified regarding his presence during police panchnama (official inspection report) at the crime scene on 13.05.2017 and identification of a wooden stick allegedly used as a weapon. The examination and cross-examination of the witness were completed, with the defense counsel declining further questioning, and no re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts