Savita Bhatu Deore vs Bhatu Prabhakar Deore Advocate - Khairnar Vanita A. — 46/2025
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12, 17,18,19,20,22. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHDH050003042025
e-Filing Number
07-02-2025
Filing Number
238/2025
Filing Date
10-02-2025
Registration No
46/2025
Registration Date
10-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
13-Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Sakri
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Savita Bhatu Deore
Adv. Kakuste Punam S.
Arti Bhatu Deore
Adv. KAKUSTE POONAM SAHEBRAO
Rushi Bhatu Deore
Adv. KAKUSTE POONAM SAHEBRAO
Respondent(s)
Bhatu Prabhakar Deore Advocate - Khairnar Vanita A.
Hira Prabhakara Deore
Adv. Khairnar Vanita A.
Prabhakar Vankar Deore
Adv. Khairnar Vanita A.
Yogesh Prabhakar Deore
Adv. Khairnar Vanita A.
Yogita Yogesh Deore
Adv. Khairnar Vanita A.
Sadhana Bhaiyya Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 13-Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Sakri
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Dismissal Order
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-02-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 13-01-2026 | Dismissal Order | |
| 12-12-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 08-12-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Sakri dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Savita Deore against Bhatu Deore in default for lack of steps. The court found that the applicant was repeatedly absent without filing any adjournment application and had failed to take effective steps despite a prior warning order, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Sakri dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application filed by Savita Deore against Bhatu Deore in default for lack of steps. The court found that the applicant was repeatedly absent without filing any adjournment application and had failed to take effective steps despite a prior warning order, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts