The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Pramod Bhalchandra Chaudhari — 87/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050002632026
Filing Number
207/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
87/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
195
Police Station
State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pramod Bhalchandra Chaudhari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Pramod Bhalchandra Chaudhari from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that critical evidence—the Chemical Analysis report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case that the accused possessed liquor with intent to sell, and continuing proceedings would constitute an abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
10-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
09-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2026
The court discharged accused Pramod Bhalchandra Chaudhari from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that critical evidence—the Chemical Analysis report—was absent from the record, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case that the accused possessed liquor with intent to sell, and continuing proceedings would constitute an abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts