The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Rakesh Narayan Davange — 85/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050002612026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
205/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
85/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
193
Police Station
State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Rakesh Narayan Davange
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 11-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court discharged accused Rakesh Narayan Davange of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The discharge was ordered because the critical Chemical Analysis Report was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie evidence that the accused committed the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell, and continuing would constitute an abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court discharged accused Rakesh Narayan Davange of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The discharge was ordered because the critical Chemical Analysis Report was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie evidence that the accused committed the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell, and continuing would constitute an abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts