The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Rakesh Narayan Davange — 85/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050002612026

Filing Number

205/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

85/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

193

Police Station

State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Excise Department

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Narayan Davange

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Rakesh Narayan Davange of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The discharge was ordered because the critical Chemical Analysis Report was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie evidence that the accused committed the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell, and continuing would constitute an abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 85/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Rakesh Narayan Davange of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The discharge was ordered because the critical Chemical Analysis Report was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie evidence that the accused committed the alleged offense of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell, and continuing would constitute an abuse of court process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case