The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner vs Vishal Rajendra Jain — 69/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050002182026

Filing Number

174/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

69/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

248

Police Station

Pimpalner

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vishal Rajendra Jain

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court disposed of the case against Vishal Rajendra Jain under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the accused's continuous absence despite multiple summons and warrants, finding no purpose in keeping the case pending. The accused was discharged from charges under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, with seized cash of Rs. 3,310 to be credited to the government, though the prosecution may revive proceedings if the accused is arrested or secured. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 69/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of the case against Vishal Rajendra Jain under Section 258 of the CrPC due to the accused's continuous absence despite multiple summons and warrants, finding no purpose in keeping the case pending. The accused was discharged from charges under Section 12-A of the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, with seized cash of Rs. 3,310 to be credited to the government, though the prosecution may revive proceedings if the accused is arrested or secured. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case