The State of Maharashtra nijampur vs Ravindra Chabulal Kale — 67/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050002162026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
172/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
67/2026
Registration Date
05-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
224
Police Station
Nizampur
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra nijampur
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Ravindra Chabulal Kale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 05-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court discharged accused Ravindra Chabulal Kale of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie that the accused committed the alleged offense of possessing unauthorized liquor for sale. Continuing the proceedings without essential evidence would constitute an abuse of the court's process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court discharged accused Ravindra Chabulal Kale of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie that the accused committed the alleged offense of possessing unauthorized liquor for sale. Continuing the proceedings without essential evidence would constitute an abuse of the court's process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts