The State of Maharashtra nijampur vs Ravindra Chabulal Kale — 67/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050002162026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

05-02-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

05-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

224

Police Station

Nizampur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra nijampur

Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

Ravindra Chabulal Kale

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

11-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

09-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

05-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court discharged accused Ravindra Chabulal Kale of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie that the accused committed the alleged offense of possessing unauthorized liquor for sale. Continuing the proceedings without essential evidence would constitute an abuse of the court's process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court discharged accused Ravindra Chabulal Kale of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC. The court found that critical material evidence—the Chemical Analysis (C.A.) Report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish prima facie that the accused committed the alleged offense of possessing unauthorized liquor for sale. Continuing the proceedings without essential evidence would constitute an abuse of the court's process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case