Samirkhan Saiyadkhan Kureshi vs Maharashtra Shasan Tarfe Pimpalner Police Station — 37/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 09th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHDH050002062026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-02-2026

Filing Number

162/2026

Filing Date

03-02-2026

Registration No

37/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

13-Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Sakri

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

0017

Police Station

Sakri

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Samirkhan Saiyadkhan Kureshi

Adv. Mavali Sanjay I.

Respondent(s)

Maharashtra Shasan Tarfe Pimpalner Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 13-Jt Civil Judge JD and JMFC Sakri

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

21-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

12-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

09-02-2026

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted interim custody of a seized vehicle (Mahindra Bolero, Reg. No. MH-43-BB-0496) to its owner Sameerkhan Kureshi under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, despite the vehicle being seized in connection with illegal animal transportation. The court imposed strict conditions including a ₹2,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on selling/mortgaging the vehicle, and mandatory production when directed, while rejecting the investigating officer's and prosecution's concerns about future misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted interim custody of a seized vehicle (Mahindra Bolero, Reg. No. MH-43-BB-0496) to its owner Sameerkhan Kureshi under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, despite the vehicle being seized in connection with illegal animal transportation. The court imposed strict conditions including a ₹2,00,000 indemnity bond, prohibition on selling/mortgaging the vehicle, and mandatory production when directed, while rejecting the investigating officer's and prosecution's concerns about future misuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case