The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Rakesh Ishwar Patil — 61/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH050001862026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
145/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
61/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
276
Police Station
State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra Excise Department
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Rakesh Ishwar Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 09-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 28-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The court discharged Rakesh Ishwar Patil from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that critical evidence—the Chemical Analysis report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell. The court deemed continuing the prosecution without such material evidence an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The court discharged Rakesh Ishwar Patil from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that critical evidence—the Chemical Analysis report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell. The court deemed continuing the prosecution without such material evidence an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts