The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Rakesh Ishwar Patil — 61/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050001862026

Filing Number

145/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

61/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

276

Police Station

State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Excise Department

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rakesh Ishwar Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The court discharged Rakesh Ishwar Patil from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that critical evidence—the Chemical Analysis report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell. The court deemed continuing the prosecution without such material evidence an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 61/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court discharged Rakesh Ishwar Patil from charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC. The court found that critical evidence—the Chemical Analysis report—was missing from the case file, making it impossible to establish a prima facie case of unauthorized liquor possession with intent to sell. The court deemed continuing the prosecution without such material evidence an abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case