The State of Maharashtra Excise Department vs Gangubai Malji Bhil — 45/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (b,c,d,f,e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050001052026

Filing Number

92/2026

Filing Date

12-Jan-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

12-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

266

Police Station

State Excise Department Dhule 1, Dhule

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (b,c,d,f,e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Excise Department

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gangubai Malji Bhil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Gangubai Malji Bhil and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to absence of critical Chemical Analysis report, finding no prima-facie evidence to establish the alleged liquor prohibition offense. The court held that continuing the case without material evidence would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Gangubai Malji Bhil and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to absence of critical Chemical Analysis report, finding no prima-facie evidence to establish the alleged liquor prohibition offense. The court held that continuing the case without material evidence would constitute abuse of process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case