The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner vs Jejiram Garu Kuwar — 27/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH050000462026

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

03-Jan-2026

Registration No

27/2026

Registration Date

03-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Sakri

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

237

Police Station

Pimpalner

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra Pimpalner

    Adv. A.P.P. for State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jejiram Garu Kuwar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Jejiram Garu Kuwar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to absence of critical evidence—specifically the Chemical Analysis report—which was essential to establish the offense. The court found that continuing the case without this material evidence would constitute an abuse of process and ruled the case stale and ineffective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Sakri

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 27/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Jejiram Garu Kuwar of charges under Section 65(E) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the CrPC due to absence of critical evidence—specifically the Chemical Analysis report—which was essential to establish the offense. The court found that continuing the case without this material evidence would constitute an abuse of process and ruled the case stale and ineffective. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case