The State of Maharashtra vs Bansilal Ratan Bhil Advocate - Bhavsar E. B. — 308/2022
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH040009262022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
607/2022
Filing Date
19-12-2022
Registration No
308/2022
Registration Date
19-12-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
335
Police Station
Dondaicha Police Station
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Bansilal Ratan Bhil Advocate - Bhavsar E. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 05-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 24-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Dondaicha acquitted Bansilal Ratan Bhil of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized materials constituted prohibited liquor. The court held that without chemical analysis reports and proper documentary evidence establishing the nature of the seized substance, relying solely on the oral testimony of a police constable was insufficient to establish guilt, and ordered the accused's acquittal with cancellation of bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court in Dondaicha acquitted Bansilal Ratan Bhil of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized materials constituted prohibited liquor. The court held that without chemical analysis reports and proper documentary evidence establishing the nature of the seized substance, relying solely on the oral testimony of a police constable was insufficient to establish guilt, and ordered the accused's acquittal with cancellation of bail bond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts