State Bank of India Branch Dondaicha vs Sharad Shivaji Patil and 3 Advocate - Patil P. G. — 78/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderIV. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH040006222024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
29-08-2024
Filing Number
249/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
78/2024
Registration Date
03-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India Branch Dondaicha
Adv. Ayachit Nitinkumar P.
Respondent(s)
Sharad Shivaji Patil and 3 Advocate - Patil P. G.
Mukesh Sambhaji Patil
Sunandabai Sambhaji Patil
Shivaji Rambhau Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Steps
Steps
Lok-Nyayalaya
Depositing Amount
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 14-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya | |
| 02-03-2026 | Depositing Amount | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition under Order 17 is allowed. Respondent No. 4 is directed to pay costs of Rs. 300/- (three hundred rupees) to the petitioner by the next hearing date or earlier. Upon payment of costs, Respondent No. 4's affidavit shall be placed on record. The court found that while there were delays in filing the affidavit, natural justice principles required giving Respondent No. 4 an opportunity to be heard before final adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition under Order 17 is allowed. Respondent No. 4 is directed to pay costs of Rs. 300/- (three hundred rupees) to the petitioner by the next hearing date or earlier. Upon payment of costs, Respondent No. 4's affidavit shall be placed on record. The court found that while there were delays in filing the affidavit, natural justice principles required giving Respondent No. 4 an opportunity to be heard before final adjudication on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts