State Bank of India Branch Dondaicha vs Shivaji Rambhau Patil and 1 Advocate - Patil P. G. — 68/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OrderIV. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 07th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH040006032024
Next Hearing
07th May 2026
e-Filing Number
26-08-2024
Filing Number
233/2024
Filing Date
29-08-2024
Registration No
68/2024
Registration Date
29-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Bank of India Branch Dondaicha
Adv. Ayachit Nitinkumar P.
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Rambhau Patil and 1 Advocate - Patil P. G.
Mukesh Sambhaji Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Steps
Steps
Lok-Nyayalaya
Depositing Amount
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 14-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 09-03-2026 | Lok-Nyayalaya | |
| 02-03-2026 | Depositing Amount | |
| 06-02-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready |
Interim Orders
The petition (Rule 17 application) is allowed with conditions. Respondent No. 2 is ordered to pay Rs. 300 (three hundred) as costs to the petitioner by the next hearing date or earlier. Upon payment of this amount, Respondent No. 2's affidavit shall be placed on record. The court found that while there were delays in filing the affidavit, natural justice principles required giving Respondent No. 2 an opportunity to be heard, and costs were awarded to compensate the petitioner for the caused inconvenience. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition (Rule 17 application) is allowed with conditions. Respondent No. 2 is ordered to pay Rs. 300 (three hundred) as costs to the petitioner by the next hearing date or earlier. Upon payment of this amount, Respondent No. 2's affidavit shall be placed on record. The court found that while there were delays in filing the affidavit, natural justice principles required giving Respondent No. 2 an opportunity to be heard, and costs were awarded to compensate the petitioner for the caused inconvenience. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts