The State of Maharashtra vs Sunitabai Bhaidas Netle — 199/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHDH040005242023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

378/2023

Filing Date

13-07-2023

Registration No

199/2023

Registration Date

13-07-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

Dondaicha

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

Sunitabai Bhaidas Netle

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha

17-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

09-03-2026

Evidence

24-02-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sunitabai Bhaidas Netale, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the prohibited liquor seized from her possession was genuine. The judge noted critical gaps in evidence, including the absence of a proper chemical analysis report of the seized liquid and the unreliability of the sole panchanama witness, concluding that the prosecution's case rested solely on the police complainant's testimony without corroborating physical or scientific evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
Evidence
09-03-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sunitabai Bhaidas Netale, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the prohibited liquor seized from her possession was genuine. The judge noted critical gaps in evidence, including the absence of a proper chemical analysis report of the seized liquid and the unreliability of the sole panchanama witness, concluding that the prosecution's case rested solely on the police complainant's testimony without corroborating physical or scientific evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case