The State of Maharashtra vs Sunitabai Bhaidas Netle — 199/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 17th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH040005242023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
378/2023
Filing Date
13-07-2023
Registration No
199/2023
Registration Date
13-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
13
Police Station
Dondaicha
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Sunitabai Bhaidas Netle
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sunitabai Bhaidas Netale, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the prohibited liquor seized from her possession was genuine. The judge noted critical gaps in evidence, including the absence of a proper chemical analysis report of the seized liquid and the unreliability of the sole panchanama witness, concluding that the prosecution's case rested solely on the police complainant's testimony without corroborating physical or scientific evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Sunitabai Bhaidas Netale, of charges under Section 65(E) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the prohibited liquor seized from her possession was genuine. The judge noted critical gaps in evidence, including the absence of a proper chemical analysis report of the seized liquid and the unreliability of the sole panchanama witness, concluding that the prosecution's case rested solely on the police complainant's testimony without corroborating physical or scientific evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts