Hanumant Ramchandra Patil vs Prakash Namdev Sutar Advocate - Ayachit Nitinkumar P. — 30/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH040004202017
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
109/2017
Filing Date
29-07-2017
Registration No
30/2017
Registration Date
29-07-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hanumant Ramchandra Patil
Adv. Patil P. G.
Respondent(s)
Prakash Namdev Sutar Advocate - Ayachit Nitinkumar P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a civil court order from a Marathi-language court in Dondaicha, Maharashtra, dealing with witness examination and cross-examination in a property dispute case (Case No. 30/2017). The witness, Yuvraj Shantaram Patil, testified about a property transaction involving agricultural fields (plot nos. 632 and 633) and a sum of Rs. 40,000. During cross-examination, the witness retracted several key claims from his initial deposition, denying knowledge of various transaction details and admitting to giving false evidence due to family pressure. The court accepted the retraction of false statements and concluded the examination on 09/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a civil court order from a Marathi-language court in Dondaicha, Maharashtra, dealing with witness examination and cross-examination in a property dispute case (Case No. 30/2017). The witness, Yuvraj Shantaram Patil, testified about a property transaction involving agricultural fields (plot nos. 632 and 633) and a sum of Rs. 40,000. During cross-examination, the witness retracted several key claims from his initial deposition, denying knowledge of various transaction details and admitting to giving false evidence due to family pressure. The court accepted the retraction of false statements and concluded the examination on 09/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts