The State of Maharashtra vs Sumanbai Bhaidas Bhil — 126/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65-e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 09th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH040003172023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
234/2023
Filing Date
17-04-2023
Registration No
126/2023
Registration Date
17-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
40
Police Station
Dondaicha
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Sumanbai Bhaidas Bhil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 25-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 07-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 26-12-2025 | N.B.W._Unready | |
| 26-11-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dondaicha (Maharashtra) disposed of the case against Sumanbai Bhaidas Bhil under Section 258 of CrPC/Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and discharged the accused from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that since the accused had repeatedly absconded despite multiple warrant issuances and the prosecution could not secure the accused's presence, there was no point in prolonging the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dondaicha (Maharashtra) disposed of the case against Sumanbai Bhaidas Bhil under Section 258 of CrPC/Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and discharged the accused from the offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court found that since the accused had repeatedly absconded despite multiple warrant issuances and the prosecution could not secure the accused's presence, there was no point in prolonging the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts