The State of Maharashtra vs Sandip Ashok Patil Advocate - Tayade J. V. — 62/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH040001782023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
123/2023
Filing Date
15-02-2023
Registration No
62/2023
Registration Date
15-02-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
452
Police Station
Dondaicha
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Sandip Ashok Patil Advocate - Tayade J. V.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 23-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 17-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Sandip Ashok Patil of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling foreign liquor without license. The court found that while the prosecution claimed to have seized alcohol from the accused's possession on December 30, 2022, the prosecution failed to provide solid evidence—including the panchnama (search record), chemical analysis report, and corroborating witness testimony—to conclusively prove the seized material was prohibited alcohol or that it came from the accused's custody. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted accused Sandip Ashok Patil of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling foreign liquor without license. The court found that while the prosecution claimed to have seized alcohol from the accused's possession on December 30, 2022, the prosecution failed to provide solid evidence—including the panchnama (search record), chemical analysis report, and corroborating witness testimony—to conclusively prove the seized material was prohibited alcohol or that it came from the accused's custody. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts