The State of Maharashtra vs Sandip Ashok Patil Advocate - Tayade J. V. — 62/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 09th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH040001782023
Filing Number
123/2023
Filing Date
15-Feb-2023
Registration No
62/2023
Registration Date
15-Feb-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
452
Police Station
Dondaicha
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sandip Ashok Patil Advocate - Tayade J. V.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court acquitted accused Sandip Ashok Patil of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling foreign liquor without license. The court found that while the prosecution claimed to have seized alcohol from the accused's possession on December 30, 2022, the prosecution failed to provide solid evidence—including the panchnama (search record), chemical analysis report, and corroborating witness testimony—to conclusively prove the seized material was prohibited alcohol or that it came from the accused's custody. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
02-Apr-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
23-Mar-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
17-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
09-Mar-2026
EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
27-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
04-Aug-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
20-May-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
03-Mar-2025
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
21-Dec-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
05-Oct-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
08-Jul-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
16-May-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
27-Mar-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
24-Jan-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
23-Nov-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
21-Aug-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
05-Jun-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
24-Mar-2023
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
-
15-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 62/2023
Summary The court acquitted accused Sandip Ashok Patil of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing and selling foreign liquor without license. The court found that while the prosecution claimed to have seized alcohol from the accused's possession on December 30, 2022, the prosecution failed to provide solid evidence—including the panchnama (search record), chemical analysis report, and corroborating witness testimony—to conclusively prove the seized material was prohibited alcohol or that it came from the accused's custody. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 255(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts