Puja Suraj alies Suresh Dhilor vs Suraj alias Suresh Siyanand Dhiloar — 7/2026
Case under Protection of Human Rights Act Section 12,21,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.
PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act
CNR: MHDH040001492026
Next Hearing
28th April 2026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
101/2026
Filing Date
04-03-2026
Registration No
7/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Puja Suraj alies Suresh Dhilor
Adv. Asha Jumma Mansuri
Rudra Alies Shiv Suraj Dhillor
Adv. Asha Jumma Mansuri
Respondent(s)
Suraj alias Suresh Siyanand Dhiloar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Evidence
Order on Exh
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 02-04-2026 | Order on Exh | |
| 30-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 27-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready | |
| 23-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for temporary custody of 19-month-old child Rudra under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court ordered the respondent (father) to immediately hand over temporary custody of the minor child to the applicant (mother) until case disposal, finding that the child's best interests rest with his breastfeeding mother. The court emphasized that breastfeeding is a fundamental right and that maternal care cannot be replaced, and directed the Protection Officer of Malegaon to assist in implementation. The order clarifies this is temporary and does not decide permanent custody, which remains open before the civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for temporary custody of 19-month-old child Rudra under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court ordered the respondent (father) to immediately hand over temporary custody of the minor child to the applicant (mother) until case disposal, finding that the child's best interests rest with his breastfeeding mother. The court emphasized that breastfeeding is a fundamental right and that maternal care cannot be replaced, and directed the Protection Officer of Malegaon to assist in implementation. The order clarifies this is temporary and does not decide permanent custody, which remains open before the civil court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts