Pandit Gorakh Bhil vs Sharad Karbhari Aher — 18/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)314,319,320,323,324(2),324(4),(5),335,336. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE on 11th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHDH040001462026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-03-2026

Filing Number

98/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha

Judge

1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4)314,319,320,323,324(2),324(4),(5),335,336

Petitioner(s)

Pandit Gorakh Bhil

Adv. PATIL ASHOK DAULAT

Respondent(s)

Sharad Karbhari Aher

Ramdas Nimba Chavhan

Kalpesh Chudhari

Laxman Rangnath Mali

HDFC Loan officer

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

04-03-2026

Awaiting Notice

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dondaicha rejected the applicant's request for a police investigation under Section 175(3) BNSS into alleged fraud and unauthorized seizure of a tractor by five accused persons. The court found the application was filed with a one-year delay, material facts were withheld, and the applicant could reasonably procure necessary evidence independently. However, the court registered the matter as a Regular Criminal Case in view of the applicant's alternative prayer for appropriate legal action against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dondaicha rejected the applicant's request for a police investigation under Section 175(3) BNSS into alleged fraud and unauthorized seizure of a tractor by five accused persons. The court found the application was filed with a one-year delay, material facts were withheld, and the applicant could reasonably procure necessary evidence independently. However, the court registered the matter as a Regular Criminal Case in view of the applicant's alternative prayer for appropriate legal action against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case