The State of Maharashtra vs Kailas Santosh Koli — 61/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHDH040001402024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
93/2024
Filing Date
28-02-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
28-02-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
287
Police Station
Dondaicha Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P. for State
Respondent(s)
Kailas Santosh Koli
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Disposed
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 24-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary Case: Summary Criminal Proceeding 61/2024, Dondaicha Court, Dhule, Maharashtra Decision: The court acquitted defendant Kailash Santosh Koli of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing Indian and foreign liquor for illegal sale. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of chemical analysis reports and inconsistencies in witness testimony regarding the seized contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary Case: Summary Criminal Proceeding 61/2024, Dondaicha Court, Dhule, Maharashtra Decision: The court acquitted defendant Kailash Santosh Koli of charges under the Mumbai Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65(E) for allegedly possessing Indian and foreign liquor for illegal sale. The prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of chemical analysis reports and inconsistencies in witness testimony regarding the seized contraband material. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts