Anil Vishwanath Nawal vs Latabai Satish Bangad and 2 Advocate - Rupchandani M. B. — 8/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: W.S. and Say. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH040001312025
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2025
Filing Number
60/2025
Filing Date
21-02-2025
Registration No
8/2025
Registration Date
21-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anil Vishwanath Nawal
Adv. PATIL PRASHANT GULABRAO
Respondent(s)
Latabai Satish Bangad and 2 Advocate - Rupchandani M. B.
Satish Badrinarayan Bangad
Kamini Bhupendra Patil
Adv. Shah Manishkumar G.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C.Dondaicha
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
W.S. and Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 30-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 09-03-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 23-02-2026 | W.S. and Say | |
| 12-02-2026 | W.S. and Say |
Interim Orders
The petition filed by the plaintiff for immediate injunction is granted. The court ordered that Respondent No. 3 must be served notice showing cause why an injunction should not be granted, and directed that if the plaintiff requests, interim injunction fees and independent bail shall be permitted. The notice is returnable by 27/02/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The petition filed by the plaintiff for immediate injunction is granted. The court ordered that Respondent No. 3 must be served notice showing cause why an injunction should not be granted, and directed that if the plaintiff requests, interim injunction fees and independent bail shall be permitted. The notice is returnable by 27/02/2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts