Hiraman Fulsing Bhil-6 vs Kusumbai Harsing Bhil Advocate - Patil D. V. — 1500037/2012
Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHDH040000812012
Next Hearing
02nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1500037/2012
Filing Date
17-03-2012
Registration No
1500037/2012
Registration Date
17-03-2012
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Dondaicha
Judge
3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Petitioner(s)
Hiraman Fulsing Bhil-6
Adv. Rupchandani M. B.
Vanabai Fulsingh Bhil
Adv. M.B.Rupchandani
Poona Balsingh Bhil
Adv. M.B.Rupchandani
Rama Balsingh Bhil
Adv. M.B.Rupchandani
Gojabai Balsingh Bhil
Adv. M.B.Rupchandani
Ladabai Balsingh Bhil
Adv. Patil D. V.
Respondent(s)
Kusumbai Harsing Bhil Advocate - Patil D. V.
Reshmabai Harsingh Bhil
Adv. D. M. Thakur
Guntabai Rupsingh Bhil
Khatabai Rupsingh Bhil
Vithabai Rupsingh Bhil
Mahajanko
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C., Dondaicha
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-12-2025 | Arguments | |
| 21-11-2025 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: The application for amendment of plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of CPC, 1908 is allowed. The plaintiffs are permitted to add contents as para 8(b) after para 8(a) regarding the alleged illegal transfer of suit property without Collector's permission under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The amendment is necessary to decide the suit on merit and does not prejudice the defendants, though plaintiffs must pay costs of Rs. 500 and submit the amended plaint on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The application for amendment of plaint under Order VI, Rule 17 of CPC, 1908 is allowed. The plaintiffs are permitted to add contents as para 8(b) after para 8(a) regarding the alleged illegal transfer of suit property without Collector's permission under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The amendment is necessary to decide the suit on merit and does not prejudice the defendants, though plaintiffs must pay costs of Rs. 500 and submit the amended plaint on or before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts