The State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Mansaram Shewale Advocate - Sonawane Ravindra S. — 224/2023

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHDH010042642023

Filing Number

1745/2023

Filing Date

05-Dec-2023

Registration No

224/2023

Registration Date

05-Dec-2023

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

32-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

353

Police Station

West Deopur

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. Purohit Vaibhav S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Mansaram Shewale Advocate - Sonawane Ravindra S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused Sunil Mansaram Shevale of electricity theft charges under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although evidence suggested meter tampering to reduce electricity recording, the court noted that the complainant and witnesses later admitted the accused had settled the electricity theft bill and penalty amount with the distribution company, leaving no pending grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  8. 15-Jan-2026

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  11. 17-Oct-2025

    Report

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Charge

    Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

  13. 22-Jul-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  14. 05-Jun-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  15. 05-Apr-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  16. 06-Feb-2025

    Charge

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  17. 05-Dec-2024

    Charge

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  18. 30-Sep-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  19. 31-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  20. 20-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  21. 15-Apr-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  22. 13-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  23. 10-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

  24. 05-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 05-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Sunil Mansaram Shevale of electricity theft charges under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although evidence suggested meter tampering to reduce electricity recording, the court noted that the complainant and witnesses later admitted the accused had settled the electricity theft bill and penalty amount with the distribution company, leaving no pending grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case