The State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Mansaram Shewale Advocate - Sonawane Ravindra S. — 224/2023

Case under Indian Electricity Act Section 135. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHDH010042642023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1745/2023

Filing Date

05-12-2023

Registration No

224/2023

Registration Date

05-12-2023

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

32-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

353

Police Station

West Deopur

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Electricity Act Section 135

Petitioner(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Adv. Purohit Vaibhav S.

Respondent(s)

Sunil Mansaram Shewale Advocate - Sonawane Ravindra S.

Hearing History

Judge: 32-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Arguments

09-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

27-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

20-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The court acquitted the accused Sunil Mansaram Shevale of electricity theft charges under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although evidence suggested meter tampering to reduce electricity recording, the court noted that the complainant and witnesses later admitted the accused had settled the electricity theft bill and penalty amount with the distribution company, leaving no pending grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused Sunil Mansaram Shevale of electricity theft charges under the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, Section 135, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Although evidence suggested meter tampering to reduce electricity recording, the court noted that the complainant and witnesses later admitted the accused had settled the electricity theft bill and penalty amount with the distribution company, leaving no pending grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case