The State of Maharashtra vs Hemantkumar Prabhakar Patil Advocate - Mehta N. P. — 165/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376(1),354,354(a),354(b),354(d),509,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 18th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHDH010042412024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1821/2024
Filing Date
10-12-2024
Registration No
165/2024
Registration Date
10-12-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
Deopur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.G.P. 1 for the State
Respondent(s)
Hemantkumar Prabhakar Patil Advocate - Mehta N. P.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 12-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 23-01-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, acquitted Hemantkumar Prabhakar Patil of all charges under IPC sections 376(1), 354-A, 354-B, 354-D, 509, 506 and IT Act sections 67, 67-A. The court found the prosecutrix (victim) turned hostile and retracted her allegations, with her in-court testimony completely contradicting the FIR; medical evidence was inconclusive and merely corroborative; and no legally admissible electronic evidence was produced. Since the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, the accused was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, acquitted Hemantkumar Prabhakar Patil of all charges under IPC sections 376(1), 354-A, 354-B, 354-D, 509, 506 and IT Act sections 67, 67-A. The court found the prosecutrix (victim) turned hostile and retracted her allegations, with her in-court testimony completely contradicting the FIR; medical evidence was inconclusive and merely corroborative; and no legally admissible electronic evidence was produced. Since the prosecution failed to prove charges beyond reasonable doubt, the accused was acquitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts