The State of Maharashtra vs Suhas Jagdish Pawara etc. 2 Advocate - Waghmare B. B. — 187/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306,323,504,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHDH010030702023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1225/2023
Filing Date
25-08-2023
Registration No
187/2023
Registration Date
25-08-2023
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
32-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
134
Police Station
Shirpur Sangvi
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Patil Parag M.
Respondent(s)
Suhas Jagdish Pawara etc. 2 Advocate - Waghmare B. B.
Jagadish Maharya Pawara
Saydabai @ Jamunabai Jagadish Pawara
Hearing History
Judge: 32-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgment | |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 07-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge at Dhule acquitted all three accused (Suhas Jagdish Pawara, Jagdish Maharya Pawara, and Saidabai Jamunabai Pawara) of charges under IPC sections 306 (abetment of suicide), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult) on March 31, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant lacked personal knowledge of the alleged mistreatment and provided only bare assertions without corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge at Dhule acquitted all three accused (Suhas Jagdish Pawara, Jagdish Maharya Pawara, and Saidabai Jamunabai Pawara) of charges under IPC sections 306 (abetment of suicide), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 504 (intentional insult) on March 31, 2026. The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the complainant lacked personal knowledge of the alleged mistreatment and provided only bare assertions without corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts