Disha Gajanan Bhalkar Through Gajanan Nimba Bhalkar vs Nikhil Ampit Masih etc — 650/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHDH010026792021
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1488/2021
Filing Date
22-09-2021
Registration No
650/2021
Registration Date
27-09-2021
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Disha Gajanan Bhalkar Through Gajanan Nimba Bhalkar
Adv. Saraf S. M.
Respondent(s)
Nikhil Ampit Masih etc
Vishal Bharat Sharma
The National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 29-10-2025 | Evidence | |
| 17-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhule dismissed the compensation application (M.A.C.P. No. 650/2021) filed by minor applicant Disha seeking Rs. 25,000 under no-fault liability principles for grievous injuries and permanent disability sustained in a motorcycle-truck collision. The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to submit documentary evidence of permanent disability despite being given opportunity, and the court found no case made out in her favor. The tribunal simultaneously framed issues for the principal claim petition and directed the applicant to present her evidence on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhule dismissed the compensation application (M.A.C.P. No. 650/2021) filed by minor applicant Disha seeking Rs. 25,000 under no-fault liability principles for grievous injuries and permanent disability sustained in a motorcycle-truck collision. The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to submit documentary evidence of permanent disability despite being given opportunity, and the court found no case made out in her favor. The tribunal simultaneously framed issues for the principal claim petition and directed the applicant to present her evidence on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts