Disha Gajanan Bhalkar Through Gajanan Nimba Bhalkar vs Nikhil Ampit Masih etc — 650/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,140,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition

CNR: MHDH010026792021

Evidence

Next Hearing

20th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1488/2021

Filing Date

22-09-2021

Registration No

650/2021

Registration Date

27-09-2021

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 166,140,

Petitioner(s)

Disha Gajanan Bhalkar Through Gajanan Nimba Bhalkar

Adv. Saraf S. M.

Respondent(s)

Nikhil Ampit Masih etc

Vishal Bharat Sharma

The National Insurance Co. Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

09-03-2026

Evidence

22-01-2026

Evidence

04-12-2025

Evidence

29-10-2025

Evidence

17-09-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

27-09-2022
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhule dismissed the compensation application (M.A.C.P. No. 650/2021) filed by minor applicant Disha seeking Rs. 25,000 under no-fault liability principles for grievous injuries and permanent disability sustained in a motorcycle-truck collision. The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to submit documentary evidence of permanent disability despite being given opportunity, and the court found no case made out in her favor. The tribunal simultaneously framed issues for the principal claim petition and directed the applicant to present her evidence on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dhule dismissed the compensation application (M.A.C.P. No. 650/2021) filed by minor applicant Disha seeking Rs. 25,000 under no-fault liability principles for grievous injuries and permanent disability sustained in a motorcycle-truck collision. The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to submit documentary evidence of permanent disability despite being given opportunity, and the court found no case made out in her favor. The tribunal simultaneously framed issues for the principal claim petition and directed the applicant to present her evidence on the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case