Gajanan Nimba Bhalkar vs Nikhil Ampit Masih etc — 649/2021
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 20th April 2026.
M.A.C.P. - Motor Accident Claim Petition
CNR: MHDH010026782021
Next Hearing
20th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1487/2021
Filing Date
22-09-2021
Registration No
649/2021
Registration Date
27-09-2021
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gajanan Nimba Bhalkar
Adv. Saraf S. M.
Respondent(s)
Nikhil Ampit Masih etc
Vishal Bharat Sharma
The National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Adv. Suryawanshi Prashant H.
Hearing History
Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence | |
| 29-10-2025 | Evidence | |
| 17-09-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dhule, dismissed the applicant's petition (M.A.C.P. No. 649/2021) seeking Rs. 25,000 compensation under no-fault liability principles for grievous injuries and permanent disability sustained in a motorcycle accident caused by a truck. The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to produce a permanent disability certificate despite seeking adjournment for the same. Issues were framed for the principal claim petition, and the applicant is directed to tender evidence on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dhule, dismissed the applicant's petition (M.A.C.P. No. 649/2021) seeking Rs. 25,000 compensation under no-fault liability principles for grievous injuries and permanent disability sustained in a motorcycle accident caused by a truck. The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to produce a permanent disability certificate despite seeking adjournment for the same. Issues were framed for the principal claim petition, and the applicant is directed to tender evidence on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts