The State of Maharashtra vs Vijay Sudam Koli etc. 2 Advocate - Waghmare B. B. — 132/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,324,323,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHDH010023582024
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1027/2024
Filing Date
29-06-2024
Registration No
132/2024
Registration Date
29-06-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Dhule
FIR Details
FIR Number
229
Police Station
Shirpur
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Tawar D. Y.
Respondent(s)
Vijay Sudam Koli etc. 2 Advocate - Waghmare B. B.
Vikki Gokul Shirsath (Koli)
Adv. Waghmare B. B.
Sudam Punju Koli
Adv. Waghmare B. B.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge Dhule
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Sessions Court of Dhule rejected the regular bail application of accused Vijay Sudam Koli, who is charged with murder (IPC §302), causing grievance injuries (§324, 323), and offences under the SC/ST Atrocities Act, 1989. The court found that Vijay played a primary role in the assault—kicking the informant and subsequently attacking the deceased with a sharp weapon on the chest, hand, and stomach—and determined there existed a risk of witness tampering and potential repetition of offences given his dominance in the village over SC/ST community members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Sessions Court of Dhule rejected the regular bail application of accused Vijay Sudam Koli, who is charged with murder (IPC §302), causing grievance injuries (§324, 323), and offences under the SC/ST Atrocities Act, 1989. The court found that Vijay played a primary role in the assault—kicking the informant and subsequently attacking the deceased with a sharp weapon on the chest, hand, and stomach—and determined there existed a risk of witness tampering and potential repetition of offences given his dominance in the village over SC/ST community members. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts