State of Maharashtra vs Akbar Jalelya alias Akbar Ali Shaha etc — 124/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 8,22(C). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHDH010019402025
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
926/2025
Filing Date
23-06-2025
Registration No
124/2025
Registration Date
23-06-2025
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
Chalisgaon Road Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.G.P. 1 for the State
Respondent(s)
Akbar Jalelya alias Akbar Ali Shaha etc
Atul alias Altaf alias Sharif Shaikh
Rijwan Sayyad Amir Sayyad (BNSS
Hearing History
Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Charge | |
| 20-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 09-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 02-03-2026 | Charge | |
| 16-02-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The bail application of Akbar Jalelya for possession of 480 bottles of Codeine Phosphate cough linctus (containing 10.772 mg codeine per 5 ml) was rejected. The court found the seized quantity constitutes commercial quantity under the NDPS Act and Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies, which bars bail when the public prosecutor opposes and the accused has prior criminal history (two previous NDPS cases in 2022). The court held mandatory procedural compliance requirements were prima facie satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The bail application of Akbar Jalelya for possession of 480 bottles of Codeine Phosphate cough linctus (containing 10.772 mg codeine per 5 ml) was rejected. The court found the seized quantity constitutes commercial quantity under the NDPS Act and Section 37 of the NDPS Act applies, which bars bail when the public prosecutor opposes and the accused has prior criminal history (two previous NDPS cases in 2022). The court held mandatory procedural compliance requirements were prima facie satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts