Asha Tushar Marathe vs Vikram Shamrao Patil — 43/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 5. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.A. - Regular Civil Appeal
CNR: MHDH010015662024
e-Filing Number
08-04-2024
Filing Number
967/2024
Filing Date
12-Apr-2024
Registration No
43/2024
Registration Date
12-Apr-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Asha Tushar Marathe
Adv. Thakawani S. S.
-
2.Manisha Dinesh Marathe
Adv. THAKWANI SAWAN SIRUMAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vikram Shamrao Patil
-
2.Vidyabai Bap Shamrao Patil Urf Vidyabai Arun Patil
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Hearing
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
07-Jan-2026
Hearing
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
21-Nov-2025
Hearing
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
17-Oct-2025
Arguments
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
13-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
15-Jul-2025
Arguments
District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
-
16-Jun-2025
Arguments
District Judge 6 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
10-Mar-2025
Arguments
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
07-Feb-2025
Arguments
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
20-Dec-2024
Payment of Paper Book Charges
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
21-Nov-2024
Payment of Paper Book Charges
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
10-Oct-2024
Payment of Paper Book Charges
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
03-Aug-2024
Payment of Paper Book Charges
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
06-Jul-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The District Court of Dhule rejected the appellants' application for stay of execution of a decree dated 11.03.2024 that ordered them to surrender possession of agricultural property to the respondents. The court found that the appellants' possession was unlawful because: (1) they occupied occupancy Class-II land without competent authority permission, and (2) their unregistered agreement for sale cannot legally support possession claims. Since the appellants had not satisfied the statutory requirements for stay under CPC Order 41 Rule 5, the application was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jul-2024
Awaiting R and P Lower Court
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
29-Jun-2024
Order on Exh
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
15-Jun-2024
Order on Exh
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
10-Jun-2024
Notice_Unready
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
03-Jun-2024
Notice_Unready
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
16-May-2024
Notice_Unready
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
10-May-2024
Notice_Unready
District Judge 5 and Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
12-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2024
Summary: The District Court of Dhule rejected the appellants' application for stay of execution of a decree dated 11.03.2024 that ordered them to surrender possession of agricultural property to the respondents. The court found that the appellants' possession was unlawful because: (1) they occupied occupancy Class-II land without competent authority permission, and (2) their unregistered agreement for sale cannot legally support possession claims. Since the appellants had not satisfied the statutory requirements for stay under CPC Order 41 Rule 5, the application was dismissed without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts