The State of Maharashtra vs Nitesh Prakashlal Ahuja Advocate - Dusane N. G. — 36/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,272,273,328. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHDH010013482024
Filing Number
511/2024
Filing Date
27-Mar-2024
Registration No
36/2024
Registration Date
27-Mar-2024
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
32-Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
232
Police Station
Dhule City
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. Sanap A. S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nitesh Prakashlal Ahuja Advocate - Dusane N. G.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Additional District Judge at Dhule acquitted Nitesh Prakashlal Ahuja of charges under IPC sections 328, 272, 273, 188 and Food Safety Standards Act 2006 sections 26(2)(iv), 27(3)(d), 27(3)(e), 30(1)(zz)(i), (v) with section 59, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was transporting prohibited pan masala and scented tobacco for sale. The court noted critical procedural gaps in evidence collection, chain-of-custody violations, and absence of credible corroborating witnesses, rendering the prosecution's case legally insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
09-Mar-2026
Judgment
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
21-Feb-2026
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
18-Sep-2025
Report
Ad-hoc District Judge -1 and Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhule
-
13-Aug-2025
Charge
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
25-Jun-2025
B.W._Unready
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
07-May-2025
B.W._Unready
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
17-Mar-2025
B.W._Unready
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
28-Jan-2025
B.W._Unready
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
21-Oct-2024
B.W._Unready
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
21-Aug-2024
B.W._Unready
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
22-Jul-2024
B.W._Unready
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
24-Jun-2024
Charge
District Judge - 1 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
24-Apr-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
24-Apr-2024
Charge
District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
20-Apr-2024
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
08-Apr-2024
Appearance
District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
27-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 36/2024
Summary The Additional District Judge at Dhule acquitted Nitesh Prakashlal Ahuja of charges under IPC sections 328, 272, 273, 188 and Food Safety Standards Act 2006 sections 26(2)(iv), 27(3)(d), 27(3)(e), 30(1)(zz)(i), (v) with section 59, finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was transporting prohibited pan masala and scented tobacco for sale. The court noted critical procedural gaps in evidence collection, chain-of-custody violations, and absence of credible corroborating witnesses, rendering the prosecution's case legally insufficient for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts