Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadhav vs State of Maharashtra — 196/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010009042026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
385/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
196/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11
Police Station
Thalner
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadhav
Adv. Sonawane Samir S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
-
2.Radhabai Ramesh Bhil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted bail to Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadav, who was accused of outraging a woman's modesty and related offences under IPC Sections 329(4), 74 BNS and SC/ST Atrocities Act provisions. The court found that material investigation was completed, further incarceration was unwarranted, and suitable conditions could address victim protection concerns. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and submission of residence proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
11-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
10-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 196/2026
The court granted bail to Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadav, who was accused of outraging a woman's modesty and related offences under IPC Sections 329(4), 74 BNS and SC/ST Atrocities Act provisions. The court found that material investigation was completed, further incarceration was unwarranted, and suitable conditions could address victim protection concerns. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and submission of residence proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts