Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadhav vs State of Maharashtra — 196/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 13th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHDH010009042026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

385/2026

Filing Date

05-03-2026

Registration No

196/2026

Registration Date

05-03-2026

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11

Police Station

Thalner

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1)(w)(i),3(1)(w)(ii),3(2)(va)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,329(4)

Petitioner(s)

Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadhav

Adv. Sonawane Samir S.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Radhabai Ramesh Bhil

Hearing History

Judge: 29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Order

05-03-2026

Notice_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted bail to Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadav, who was accused of outraging a woman's modesty and related offences under IPC Sections 329(4), 74 BNS and SC/ST Atrocities Act provisions. The court found that material investigation was completed, further incarceration was unwarranted, and suitable conditions could address victim protection concerns. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and submission of residence proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Brijendrakumar Ramadhin Yadav, who was accused of outraging a woman's modesty and related offences under IPC Sections 329(4), 74 BNS and SC/ST Atrocities Act provisions. The court found that material investigation was completed, further incarceration was unwarranted, and suitable conditions could address victim protection concerns. The accused was released on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one local surety, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and submission of residence proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case