Santosh Chindha Waghmode vs State Of Maharashtra — 185/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 13th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHDH010008592026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

366/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

185/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL REFUSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

90

Police Station

Dhule Taluka

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108

Petitioner(s)

Santosh Chindha Waghmode

Adv. More Kamlesh R.

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Order

09-03-2026

Reply/Say

07-03-2026

Reply/Say

05-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Santosh Chindha Waghmode, accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (abetment of suicide) in connection with his wife Manisha's death. The court found that the allegations—that the applicant harassed and threatened the deceased over her contact with her ex-husband, leading to her suicide—were serious and the investigation was at a crucial stage requiring material evidence collection, making custodial detention necessary at this point. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Santosh Chindha Waghmode, accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (abetment of suicide) in connection with his wife Manisha's death. The court found that the allegations—that the applicant harassed and threatened the deceased over her contact with her ex-husband, leading to her suicide—were serious and the investigation was at a crucial stage requiring material evidence collection, making custodial detention necessary at this point. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case