Santosh Chindha Waghmode vs State Of Maharashtra — 185/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010008592026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
366/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
185/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
90
Police Station
Dhule Taluka
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santosh Chindha Waghmode
Adv. More Kamlesh R.
Respondent(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Order | |
| 09-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 07-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 05-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Santosh Chindha Waghmode, accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (abetment of suicide) in connection with his wife Manisha's death. The court found that the allegations—that the applicant harassed and threatened the deceased over her contact with her ex-husband, leading to her suicide—were serious and the investigation was at a crucial stage requiring material evidence collection, making custodial detention necessary at this point. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the bail application of Santosh Chindha Waghmode, accused under Section 108 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (abetment of suicide) in connection with his wife Manisha's death. The court found that the allegations—that the applicant harassed and threatened the deceased over her contact with her ex-husband, leading to her suicide—were serious and the investigation was at a crucial stage requiring material evidence collection, making custodial detention necessary at this point. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts