Dayaram Tukaram Pawara etc 2 vs State of Maharashtra — 183/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010008332026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
361/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
292
Police Station
Shirpur Sangvi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dayaram Tukaram Pawara etc 2
Adv. Waghmare B. B.
Haliram Tukaram Pawara
Adv. WAGHAMARE BHAVESH BHAGWAN
Vikas Kotwal Solanki
Adv. WAGHAMARE BHAVESH BHAGWAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Order
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Order | |
| 04-03-2026 | Order | |
| 27-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed the bail application and granted bail to the three accused (Dayaram Tukaram Pawara, Haliram Tukaram Pawara, and Vikas Kotwal Solanki) on the grounds that while a charge sheet was filed, further incarceration was unwarranted since there was no pending recovery or discovery and no other crimes were pending against them. The accused were released on personal bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with one surety each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and submission of residence proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the bail application and granted bail to the three accused (Dayaram Tukaram Pawara, Haliram Tukaram Pawara, and Vikas Kotwal Solanki) on the grounds that while a charge sheet was filed, further incarceration was unwarranted since there was no pending recovery or discovery and no other crimes were pending against them. The accused were released on personal bonds of Rs. 20,000 each with one surety each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and submission of residence proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts