Jitendra Sahebrao Kakuste vs State of Maharashtra — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHDH010008242026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

Jitendra Sahebrao Kakuste

Adv. Deore Sunil B.

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

Krishna Kumar Chaganlal More

Hearing History

Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

07-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

Judgment

25-03-2026

Judgment

16-03-2026

Judgment

09-03-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Sessions Court, Dhule partly allowed the criminal revision petition and held that the magistrate's order directing FIR registration against the public servant petitioner was illegal and improper for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Sections 175(3), 175(4)(a), and 175(4)(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court stayed further investigation against the petitioner, relying on the principle of parity with similar cases and a High Court precedent involving a co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Dhule partly allowed the criminal revision petition and held that the magistrate's order directing FIR registration against the public servant petitioner was illegal and improper for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Sections 175(3), 175(4)(a), and 175(4)(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court stayed further investigation against the petitioner, relying on the principle of parity with similar cases and a High Court precedent involving a co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case