Jitendra Sahebrao Kakuste vs State of Maharashtra — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.Rev.App. - Criminal Revision Application

CNR: MHDH010008242026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jitendra Sahebrao Kakuste

    Adv. Deore Sunil B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

  2. 2.Krishna Kumar Chaganlal More

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Dhule partly allowed the criminal revision petition and held that the magistrate's order directing FIR registration against the public servant petitioner was illegal and improper for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Sections 175(3), 175(4)(a), and 175(4)(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court stayed further investigation against the petitioner, relying on the principle of parity with similar cases and a High Court precedent involving a co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

  8. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Dhule partly allowed the criminal revision petition and held that the magistrate's order directing FIR registration against the public servant petitioner was illegal and improper for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under Sections 175(3), 175(4)(a), and 175(4)(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court stayed further investigation against the petitioner, relying on the principle of parity with similar cases and a High Court precedent involving a co-accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case