Mahendra Anaram Fardauda vs State of Maharashtra — 172/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 09th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010007472026
e-Filing Number
21-02-2026
Filing Number
331/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
172/2026
Registration Date
21-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
42
Police Station
Shirpur Sangvi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mahendra Anaram Fardauda
Adv. Waghmare B. B.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 29-District Judge 4 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Order | |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 02-03-2026 | Notice_Unready | |
| 24-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to Mahendra Anaram Fardauda, who was accused of transporting contraband panmasala and scented tobacco worth Rs. 23,19,510 in a luxury bus under Food Safety and Standards Act offences. The court found no justifiable ground for detention since the offences were non-bailable, the contraband and vehicle were already seized, and there was no risk of tampering with public servant witnesses, while suitable bail conditions could address concerns about absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to Mahendra Anaram Fardauda, who was accused of transporting contraband panmasala and scented tobacco worth Rs. 23,19,510 in a luxury bus under Food Safety and Standards Act offences. The court found no justifiable ground for detention since the offences were non-bailable, the contraband and vehicle were already seized, and there was no risk of tampering with public servant witnesses, while suitable bail conditions could address concerns about absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts