Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani vs The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State — 159/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010007052026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
313/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
159/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL GRANTED
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
397
Police Station
Dhule City
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani
Adv. Nilesh Dusane
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted bail to Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani, accused of outraging a woman's modesty and threatening her under sections 74, 75, 351(2), 351(3), and 352(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the applicant had been in custody since December 21, 2025, further detention served no useful purpose, though bail was conditioned on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety and restrictions on witness tampering, leaving India, and changing residence without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
09-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
02-Mar-2026
Arguments
District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
23-Feb-2026
Arguments
District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 159/2026
The court granted bail to Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani, accused of outraging a woman's modesty and threatening her under sections 74, 75, 351(2), 351(3), and 352(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the applicant had been in custody since December 21, 2025, further detention served no useful purpose, though bail was conditioned on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety and restrictions on witness tampering, leaving India, and changing residence without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts