Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani vs The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State — 159/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHDH010007052026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

313/2026

Filing Date

18-02-2026

Registration No

159/2026

Registration Date

18-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

397

Police Station

Dhule City

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,75,351(2),351(3),352

Petitioner(s)

Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani

Adv. Nilesh Dusane

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra Advocate - A.G.P. 1 for the State

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Order

02-03-2026

Arguments

23-02-2026

Arguments

18-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court granted bail to Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani, accused of outraging a woman's modesty and threatening her under sections 74, 75, 351(2), 351(3), and 352(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the applicant had been in custody since December 21, 2025, further detention served no useful purpose, though bail was conditioned on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety and restrictions on witness tampering, leaving India, and changing residence without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Jacky Sadhusing Tanwani, accused of outraging a woman's modesty and threatening her under sections 74, 75, 351(2), 351(3), and 352(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court found that since investigation was completed, charge-sheet filed, and the applicant had been in custody since December 21, 2025, further detention served no useful purpose, though bail was conditioned on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with a surety and restrictions on witness tampering, leaving India, and changing residence without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case