Jitendra Vijay Sonawane vs State Of Maharashtra — 147/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--BAIL GRANTED on 11th March 2026.

Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application

CNR: MHDH010006512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

292/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

147/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

District and Session Court ,Dhule

Judge

3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--BAIL GRANTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

43

Police Station

Dhule City

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,75,76,78,351(2),351(3),351(4),352

Petitioner(s)

Jitendra Vijay Sonawane

Adv. Salunke Mohandas B.

Respondent(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 3-District Judge 3 and Additional Sessions Judge Dhule

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Order

02-03-2026

Order

23-02-2026

Order

20-02-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

SUMMARY: The court granted bail to Jitendra Vijay Sonawane, accused of sexual harassment, stalking, and outraging modesty under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 74, 75, 76, 78, 351(2)-(4), and 352. The court found that investigation was nearly complete with key evidence (mobile phone, witness statements, panchnamas) already collected, making further custodial interrogation unnecessary. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with strict conditions including weekly police reporting, non-contact with the victim, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court granted bail to Jitendra Vijay Sonawane, accused of sexual harassment, stalking, and outraging modesty under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 74, 75, 76, 78, 351(2)-(4), and 352. The court found that investigation was nearly complete with key evidence (mobile phone, witness statements, panchnamas) already collected, making further custodial interrogation unnecessary. The applicant was released on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with strict conditions including weekly police reporting, non-contact with the victim, and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Court ,Dhule All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case