Manojkumar Madhubhai Halpati etc 2 vs State of Maharashtra — 140/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--BAIL REFUSED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHDH010006252026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
276/2026
Filing Date
11-02-2026
Registration No
140/2026
Registration Date
11-02-2026
Court
District and Session Court ,Dhule
Judge
28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--BAIL REFUSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
The State Excise Dhule
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manojkumar Madhubhai Halpati etc 2
Adv. Waghmare B. B.
Rahulbhai Lalubhai Halpati
Adv. WAGHAMARE BHAVESH BHAGWAN
Rajesh Radka Halpati
Adv. WAGHAMARE BHAVESH BHAGWAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 28-District Judge 5 and Addl. Sessions Judge Dhule
Disposed
Order
Arguments
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Order | |
| 04-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of three accused (Manojkumar Halpati, Rahulbhai Halpati, and Rajesh Halpati) charged with inter-state liquor smuggling under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the offense grave and serious, involving seizure of liquor worth Rs. 14,73,864 smuggled from Daman, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the supply chain and distribution network. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the anticipatory bail application of three accused (Manojkumar Halpati, Rahulbhai Halpati, and Rajesh Halpati) charged with inter-state liquor smuggling under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the offense grave and serious, involving seizure of liquor worth Rs. 14,73,864 smuggled from Daman, and determined that custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the supply chain and distribution network. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts